https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pattullo_Bridge https://www.pattullobridgereplacement.ca/
https://www.pattullobridgereplacement.ca/about/projectoverview/
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Newburgh%E2%80%93Beacon_Bridge
https://changingvancouver.wordpress.com/2021/12/23/burrard-bridge/
https://changingvancouver.wordpress.com/2022/12/26/downtown-false-creek-from-above/
https://changingvancouver.wordpress.com/2022/01/03/burrard-inlet-waterfront-from-above/
https://changingvancouver.wordpress.com/2023/01/02/burrard-inlet-waterfront-from-above-2/
https://changingvancouver.wordpress.com/2013/01/07/burrard-building/
https://dailyhive.com/vancouver/broadway-plan-pace-of-change-policy-rental-housing-issues
https://dailyhive.com/vancouver/vancouver-rent-more-expensive-2023
https://dailyhive.com/vancouver/bc-housing-market-starting-to-balance-report
https://dailyhive.com/montreal/rent-report-march-montreal-price
https://dailyhive.com/canada/canada-home-prices-inflation-employment-forecast-2023
https://dailyhive.com/canada/canada-housing-market-downturn-bottom-forecast-2023
https://dailyhive.com/vancouver/canada-line-skytrain
50 m short SkyTrain-Canada+Line stations are so symbolic of the reluctance to have Montreal Metro & Toronto Subway length stations that are 152.5 m or 500 feet long.
To allow Montreal & Toronto size stations in Greater Vancouver would be indicative of accepting & planning for big city type growth. Indeed, all the SkyTrain stations were deliberately built to be shorter than any underground stations in Edmonton, Seattle & Portland. Even the new underground stations in Calgary will be longer, that's because Calgary, like so many other real cities, aren't under the control of a Vancouverization type agenda.
https://dailyhive.com/vancouver/translink-2017-kevin-desmond-canada-line-built-skytrain
However, Vancouver & BC are all about congestive planning. Thus, building small & narrow provides great symbolism against building big. Of course who knows where all the decades of money went, because it didn't all go into the half-size infrastructure? It's quite a strange approach, have short trains & narrow bridges, but pay full price & hope that no one notices. This is terrible for people who would like to have proper size big city infrastructure.
Greater Vancouver should have had all of its Skytrain stations built to be at least 500 feet or 152.45 m. There should have been bus & HOV bridges built next to all of the narrow bridges, several decades ago. However, that would conflict with the madness of Vancouverization.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Canada_Line#Canada_Line_Hyundai_Rotem_specifications
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Canada_Line#Stations Wow, design & build a multibillion dollar train line that can only be expanded from an absurd 2 car train upto a 2.5 car train. No need to have a provision for a 6, 8 or 10 car trains. That's what a big city would do, but Vancouver & Richmond are all about taking a congestive planning approach. That's the backwater BC way.
https://vancouversun.com/news/local-news/translink-adds-more-trains-to-its-canada-line-fleet
https://jfdatalinks.blogspot.com/search?q=SkyTrain-Canada+Line