The Iron Bridge should have had a bus, truck and LRT bridge built next to it decades ago.
https://jfdatalinks.blogspot.com/search?q=Second+Narrows+Bridge
UTL is about exploring past, present and future urban technologies in science and fiction, etc...
The Iron Bridge should have had a bus, truck and LRT bridge built next to it decades ago.
https://jfdatalinks.blogspot.com/search?q=Second+Narrows+Bridge
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ironworkers_Memorial_Second_Narrows_Crossing#Collapse
After the collapse, there was a chance that the Iron_Bridge (IwB) could have been totally redesigned, but this is BC. Its very difficult in BC to design transportation infrastructure with significant future capacity. The Iron Bridge should have been built along the lines of the 12 lane Ship_Canal_Bridge (SCB) in Seattle. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ship_Canal_Bridge
Unlike Seattle and Washington State, so much in BC is built to a provincial backwater standard. Thus, nothing on the scale of the SCB has ever been allowed in BC. https://pauldorpat.com/2014/05/17/seattle-now-then-the-ship-canal-bridge Sunce an LRT line wasn't possible for the SCB, it runs sort of parallel in a tunnel to the UW. Of course LRT to UBC is still an incomplete BC pipe dream.
The IwB should have had at least 8 lanes on an upper deck and 4 lanes on a lower deck for extra bus and truck lanes. There should have also been a provision for 2 LRT tracks on a lower deck, but that would be properly planning for the future.
Unfortunately, the Vancouver Mind Virus (VMV) ruined the Burrard-Bridge. The Burrard_Street Bridge (BSB) opened with 6 lanes and a lower level provision for a double track streetcar crossing.
Foolishly, because the city didn't want to build a parallel bike bridge, 2 lanes were removed from the BSB. This has made it very unlikely that the BSB will be able to have 2 bus lanes. No lower level streetcar crossing was ever built. Yet, a streetcar line on both side of False Creek could have been a nice thing to have up and running. Ironically, Vancouver was one of the first cities to get rid of its streetcars and will likely be one of the last to bring them back. The VMV is such a horrible thing, yet it officially doesn't exist.
https://jfdatalinks.blogspot.com/search?q=Second+Narrows+Bridge
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jabSGw2M4tA
Seattle's New Light Rail On a FLOATING BRIDGE https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vmh5uVguIlM
Seattle's Sound Transit just expanded their Link Light Rail system by running the 2 Line across a floating bridge https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vmh5uVguIlM&t=2s
Seattle has a good extensive regional train system and its getting bigger and better.
Some years after Montreal and so many years after Perth, but still better than backwards Vancouver.
Perth Narrows_Bridge
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Narrows_Bridge_(Perth)#Railway_bridge:_2005
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:6_car_train_on_narrows.JPG
Unfortunately, all of these nice train and wide highway bridges aren't allowed in narrowminded Vancouver. A congestive transportation approach was implemented decades ago.
https://jfdatalinks.blogspot.com/search?q=Second+Narrows+Bridge
https://financialpost.com/opinion/opinion-users-need-more-say-about-vancouvers-rail-bridges
The Greater Vancouver Region should have had all of its freight rail bridges at least double tracked by now.
https://www.cn.ca/en/stories/20250429-cn-and-port-of-vancouver-collaborating/
There is a subtle KEEP BC SMALL AND BACKWARDS mentality, but sometimes it's right in your face.
https://financialpost.com/opinion/opinion-vancouvers-port-must-up-its-grain-game
Its as if there is a VMV and the BC Mind Virus. Although no one can actually pinpoint it, the effects of it are quite apparent.
https://financialpost.com/opinion/nutrien-bypass-port-vancouver-underscores-need-change
Despite the size of Canada, it has less than 1% of the world's population.
https://www.portvancouver.com/project/second-narrows-dredging-works
Unfortunately, by not even keeping up with moderate infrastructure growth demands, Canada keeps falling behind in a world with over 8 billion people.
There should be a way to expand the economy and population, while making things more affordable.
Vancouver keeps holding back the scale of bridges, trains and buildings. This is part of a symbolic mentality and agenda to not think like a proper big city.
https://jfdatalinks.blogspot.com/search?q=Second+Narrows+Bridge
https://dailyhive.com/vancouver/second-narrows-rail-bridge-malfunction
The tunnel should have been built wide enough to eventually accommodate 2 tracks. Either there should have been a provision to build a 2nd fright bridge and tunnel, or simply have designed a double track bridge and tunnel that could easily and regularly be maintained.
This all symbolically fits in with with the narrow-minded mentality to not build proper big city infrastructure.
https://jfdatalinks.blogspot.com/search?q=Second+Narrows+Bridge
The Second Narrows Crossing Area
https://www.vmcdn.ca/f/files/glaciermedia/images/climate-enviro-solutions/oceans/proposed-burrard-inlet-dredging.jpg;w=960 A commuter rail, rapid bus and HOV bridge was never built next to the Iron Bridge, which doesn't even have any emergency lanes. The freight train bridge and tunnel east of it, wasn't designed to eventually accommodate 2 tracks. Taking a narrower bridge and tunnel approach symbolically fits right in with the narrow-minded mentality that is BC.
https://www.bchydro.com/energy-in-bc/projects/second-narrows-crossing-project.html
Port, rail and highway congestion, that's the planning approach in backwards BC.
https://jfdatalinks.blogspot.com/search?q=Second+Narrows+Bridge
The Port of Vancouver is several decades behind with its infrastructure. Perhaps the new series of tariffs & subsequent slowdown will help to ensure that Vancouver's port infrastructure will remain stunted for may more years.
https://dailyhive.com/vancouver/thornton-tunnel-burnaby-fake-house-canadian-national-cn-railway
At a time when it would have been so much cheaper in the 1960s, the Second+Narrows+Rail+Bridge and the Thornton_Tunnel should have been built wide enough to eventually accommodate 2 sets of tracks.
The New_Westminster Rail_Bridge should have been twinned a few generations ago. Really, a new 2-4 track bridge should have been built at least a few decades ago. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_Westminster_Bridge#Proposed_changes
https://events.decorporate.ca/TAC2024/abstract/submission-summary.php?y=cGFwZXJJZD0xMDI5OTI=
https://jfdatalinks.blogspot.com/search?q=Second+Narrows+Bridge
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Second_Narrows_Rail_Bridge#Original_bridge_(1925) This is a smaller bridge than what was originally planned. Of course, that's the backwards BC way.
https://www.nsnews.com/in-the-community/time-traveller-the-first-second-narrows-bridge-1925-3118875
https://www.northshoreheritage.org/blog/2023/11/23/bridge-over-burrards-water
https://searcharchives.vancouver.ca/second-narrows-bridge-vancouver-b-c-opened-november-7th-1925-2
https://search.nbca.unbc.ca/index.php/second-narrows-bridge-in-vancouver-bc-6
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Second_Narrows_Rail_Bridge (1969)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thornton_Tunnel#History Unfortunatly, the new tunnel & bridge weren't designed to be wide enough to eventually accommodate a parallel track. Thus, N. Vancouver & Vancouver are still in the single track crossing trap, just like NW & Surrey are.
https://jfdatalinks.blogspot.com/search?q=Second+Narrows+Bridge
https://jfdatalinks.blogspot.com/search?q=old+and+new+narrow+bridges
https://dailyhive.com/vancouver/north-shore-skytrain-burrard-inlet-rapid-transit-brt-lrt-study
Since the planned North_Shore train won't be running 24 hours a day, there should be at least 1 bus & 1 HOV lane for each direction. There should also be 2 truck lanes & at least 2 wide emergency lanes. Unfortunately, the Ironworkers-Memorial-Bridge-replacement-concept only depicts 3 general lanes each way, plus only 2 extra lanes that could become a bus & HOV lane. The shoulders don't look like they will be as wide as a regular lane, but still might barely function as an emergency lane for fire-trucks, etc. There also doesn't look like any provision for a bike & foot path for both sides of the bridge.
Thus, once again, it's a narrow-minded Vancouver & especially a backward BC bridge, being designed to be narrower than what it should be.
https://vancouvertraces.weebly.com/the-first-and-second-narrows-crossings.html
https://jfdatalinks.blogspot.com/search?q=Second+Narrows+Bridge
https://jfdatalinks.blogspot.com/search?q=Ironworkers+Memorial+Bridge
https://dailyhive.com/vancouver/bc-united-north-shore-skytrain-ironworkers-memorial-bridge
The original Second+Narrows+Bridge could be upgraded and become part of an improved crossing.
Either a rapid-bus crossing first, or a train crossing with 2 buss lanes for whenever the train is shut down. The NW Skybridge wasn't designed to have 2 bus & 2 bike lanes & 2 footpaths. Thus, the SkyBridge to Surrey remains as a fine inept example of backward BC planning.
The North-Arm-Bridge to Richmond was also not designed to have 2 bus lanes, 2 bike lanes & 2 footpaths. Just one combined bike & footpath. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/North_Arm_Bridge
Unfortunately, Greater Vancouver doesn't want to provide 24hr trains. Yet, there seems to be a reluctance to have a series of regional bus-bridges, because most of the existing bridges are too narrow to have 2 extra bus lanes.
https://vancouvertraces.weebly.com/the-first-and-second-narrows-crossings.html
https://jfdatalinks.blogspot.com/search?q=Ironworkers+Memorial+Bridge
https://jfdatalinks.blogspot.com/search?q=North+Shore+of+Greater+Vancouver
https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/british-columbia/ironworkers-memorial-bridge-collapse-1958-1.5615447
https://www.ironworkers.ca/58-years-second-narrows-bridge-collapse-lost-lives-not-forgotten/
The Iron Bridge has heled up very well through the decades, but it just wasn't designed with future bus, truck lanes and LRT capacity in mind.
https://jfdatalinks.blogspot.com/search?q=Second+Narrows+Bridge
https://ascelibrary.org/doi/10.1061/9780784481035.014
Unfortunately, when the Iron Bridge was rebuilt, there was no concept for a couple of bus lanes.
There should have been at least 2 emergency lanes, but it was decide to just jam everything into only 3 lanes each way.
https://vancouversun.com/news/this-day-in-history-june-17-1958
https://www.thecanadianencyclopedia.ca/en/article/second-narrows-bridge-collapse
https://news.gov.bc.ca/releases/2018TRAN0045-001202
https://www.ironworkers.ca/58-years-second-narrows-bridge-collapse-lost-lives-not-forgotten/
https://jfdatalinks.blogspot.com/search?q=Second+Narrows+Bridge
https://jfdatalinks.blogspot.com/search?q=Ironworkers+Memorial+Bridge
https://www.vancouverisawesome.com/local-news/5-things-you-probably-didnt-know-about-the-burrard-bridge-7129420 The BSB used to have 6 lanes, but was reduced to 4, because the city didn't want to build a parallel bike bridge.
https://vancouverhistory.ca/places/burrard-bridge
Hopefully, the VMV will never cause the removal of 2 lanes from the congested 6 lane Second+Narrows+Bridge.
https://vancouverhistory.ca/events/collapse-of-the-second-narrows-bridge
https://jfdatalinks.blogspot.com/search?q=Burrard+Bridge A parallel bike bridge could allow the BSB to have 6 lanes again, with 2 of them for buses.
https://jfdatalinks.blogspot.com/search?q=Second+Narrows+Bridge A parallel express bus or BRT bridge with 2 truck lanes and 2 LRT tracks would greatly improve crossing capacity.