https://dailyhive.com/vancouver/young-bc-residents-homeownership
Tuesday, January 14, 2025
Monday, January 13, 2025
Federal Court rejects environmentalists' bid to halt B.C. port expansion
Roberts Bank Terminal 2 project in Delta was opposed by groups who said expansion would harm orca, salmon https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/british-columbia/federal-court-roberts-bank-terminal-2-1.7430431
https://thenarwhal.ca/roberts-bank-terminal-2-explainer/
Court upholds approval of B.C. port expansion
https://www.delta-optimist.com/highlights/court-upholds-approval-of-bc-port-expansion-despite-risks-to-whales-10069295 It remains to be seen if slow moving B.C. & Canada will eventually allow the Port_of_Vancouver to be on the same grand scale of what Brisbane and Singapore have allowed.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roberts_Bank_Superport
Whether, its Delta, Surrey, Richmond, NW, Burnaby, it's all part of the Greater Vancouver_Port_facilities.
If the expansion went sideways, but not further west into Georgia Straight, the area is still limited. However, if the expansion were to go a little further west into Georgia Straight, then their might be more of an argument against it.
The Port_of_Brisbane wouldn't be as big & mighty if it was bound by anything similar to the way how Canada builds its seaports.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Port_of_Brisbane#History
https://www.portbris.com.au , https://www.portbris.com.au/major-projects/fpe , https://www.portbris.com.au/major-projects/dedicated-rail-connectivity , https://www.portbris.com.au/portbris-2060
https://www.portsaustralia.com.au/members/port-of-brisbane
https://www.qic.com/Investment-Capabilities/Infrastructure/Global-Portfolio/Port-of-Brisbane
The Port_of_Singapore is so far away from the way of how Canada builds its ports.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Port_of_Singapore#Since_2022
https://www.mpa.gov.sg/port-marine-ops/operations/port-infrastructure/terminals
Brisbane and Singapore are on the same ocean as the BC part of Canada. Unfortunatly, Canada doesn't seem to want to have the same port scale & presence as those 2 Pacific ports. Being from backwards Vancouver, it's hard to fathom what Brisbane and Singapore have been able to do. Then again, they don't have to contend with the backwater BC mentality and its imposed restrictions.
Since Asia is the most populated part of the planet and BC is on the edge of the Pacific Rim, there should be plans to eventually have a BC port on the scale of the Port_of_Rotterdam. Or, the Port_of_Los_Angeles and the Port_of_Long_Beach, but with better coordinated efficiency.
https://www.burnabynow.com/economy-law-politics/david-eby-bc-prepared-for-economic-defence-against-american-threats-10060694 Canada needs to expand its trading with more countries.
Despite its overall area, Canada is far from housing even 1% of the world's population. Australia even has less people, but somehow they don't seem to have their own version of KEEP CANADA SMALL.
Being from the provincial backwater that is BC, its always amazing to see how Queensland can flourish, because it doesn't have the mutigenerational hindrances that backwards BC imposes.
https://jfdatalinks.blogspot.com/search?q=B.C.
https://jfdatalinks.blogspot.com/search?q=Brisbane & Queensland
https://jfdatalinks.blogspot.com/search?q=Brisbane+Airport+Railway+Line
The Kingsgate Mall saga
https://dailyhive.com/vancouver/kingsgate-mall-beedie-vancouver-school-board-appeal-decision
Kingsgate_Mall is situated in what should be the location of a very large development, but nothing seems to be on the horizon in backwater Vancouver.
https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/british-columbia/vancouver-school-board-kingsgate-mall-1.7429088
Knight Street Bridge
Despite the Knight_Street_Bridge opening in the 1970s for a seaport city, it wasn't designed to have 2 bus lanes, 2 HOV lanes & 2 truck lanes or even 2 emergency lanes. It was hardly designed with any future corridor-capacity in mind. Such narrow sidewalks that there should have been a bus & bike bridge built next to it decades ago.
https://trafficcams.vancouver.ca/knightMarineBridge.htm
https://images.drivebc.ca/bchighwaycam/pub/html/www/695.html
https://trafficcams.vancouver.ca/knight.htm
https://jfdatalinks.blogspot.com/search?q=Knight+Street+Bridge
Oak Street Bridge
https://images.drivebc.ca/bchighwaycam/pub/html/www/70.html
No emergency or breakdown lanes & especially no bus lanes. Indeed, this 4 lane bottleneck-chokepoint should have opened with 6 lanes & 2 wide shoulders & 2 wide sidewalks.
https://vancouver.ca/streets-transportation/oak-street-sewer-separation-upgrades.aspx
Granville Street & Oak Street are both 6 lanes wide, but the Oak_Street_Bridge is only 4 lanes wide. Unfortunately, back in the 1950s, the planners never allowed for 2 bus lanes, 2 truck lanes or even 2 wide emergency lanes. Thus, everything is crammed into only 2 lanes each way. Fortunately, most cities don't take such a congestive planning approach.
Arthur Laing Bridge
The Arthur_Laing_Bridge should have been 6 lanes wide to easily accomodate 2 bus lanes. There should have also been 2 very wide sidewalks. Of course that never happened. By now, there should have been at least a bus & bike bridge built next to it.
The Canada Line wasn't designed to have 10 car trains, not even 5 car trains. Its maximum design only allows for a 2.5 car train, someday. All the 50m underground stations should have had a level clearance of 50m at each end, so that eventually the stations could be about as long as the 152.5m Montreal Metro stations. Its another fine example of backwards Vancouver planning & backwater BC planning.
https://jfdatalinks.blogspot.com/search?q=Arthur+Laing+Bridge
Granville Street Bridge
https://vancouver.ca/streets-transportation/granville-bridge-structural-work.aspx
One might think that the 1950s Granville_Street_Bridge (GSB) or Granville+Bridge was built with a lot of future capacity in mind.
https://vancouver.ca/streets-transportation/granville-bridge-connector.aspx
At least the bridge started out with 8 lanes, but narrow sidewalks. In order to put in 2 good sidewalks & 2 bike lanes, 2 traffic lanes had to be removed. At least with 6 lanes, the GS Bridge can still eventually have 2 bus lanes. However, had the original sidewalks been tripled in width, the bridge could have still had 8 lanes. 6 general lanes & 2 bus lanes.
https://granvilleisland.com/news/transportation-updates-on-granville-bridge-city-of-vancouver
Unfortunately, the Granville+Bridge wasn't designed to have a lower deck for future streetcars or tram-trains, because it didn't seem necessary back in the 1950s. Of course Vancouver & the region never built a series of wide freeways & expressways, so retaining the streetcars & interurban trains would have been a good idea.
Fortunately, the backward Vancouver mentality wasn't able to convince Melbourne to give up on its trams. Imagine if Toronto, Boston, Philadelphia, New Orléans & especially SF gave up on having their streetcars.
Now Vancouver stands to be one of the last major cities & urban areas to bring back the streetcars or tram-trains in the form of modern LRT vehicles.
Express bus lanes or rapid bus right of ways can be very good, but a LRV is also a very good transit mode that's in-between a subway or an urban metro train line.
https://jfdatalinks.blogspot.com/search?q=Granville+Street+Bridge
Cambie Street and Bridge
https://vancouver.ca/streets-transportation/cambie-street-bridge-upgrades.aspx
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cambie_Bridge#The_present_bridge
Such utter foolishness to not have wide sidewalks on both sides to accommodate bike lanes. Then the bridge wouldn't have been reduced from 6 to 5 lanes.
https://jfdatalinks.blogspot.com/search?q=Cambie+Street+Bridge
The Grandview Viaduct
https://vancouver.ca/streets-transportation/grandview-viaduct-structural-rehabilitation.aspx
https://cityhallwatch.wordpress.com/tag/grandview-viaduct If a bridge can't or won't be widened for bike lanes, then a new bike-bridge could or should be built.
https://grandviewheritagegroup.ca/2022/07/01/the-viaduct-that-saved-grandview-1938/
https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/british-columbia/grandview-viaduct-closes-for-repairs-1.5707945 Unfortunatly, back in the day, there didn't seem to be a good enough reason to have very wide sidewalks. By the 2020s, the city should have built a bike-bridge parallel to it. Or, have doubled the width of the sidewalks by building out at least another meter on each side.
https://cityhallwatch.wordpress.com/2020/07/31/grandview-viaduct-active-transportation/
If done properly, adding bike lanes & especially bike-bridges doesn't mean that traffic lanes have to be removed from the mostly already narrow bridges in Greater Vancouver.
The Erasmus Bridge (1996)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Erasmusbrug
It carries 2 tramway tracks, 4 traffic lanes, 2 cycle tracks & 2 sidewalks. It's such a nice wide bridge.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Erasmusbrug#Design
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Erasmusbrug#Gallery
https://structurae.net/en/structures/erasmus-bridge
The Tilikum+Crossing is an equally well designed bridge. Unfortunatly, such good multimodal bridges don't seem to be allowed in BC.
If only the Cambie+Bridge and The+North+Arm+Bridge could have been built to a similar standard...
Unfortunatly, Vancouver & BC seems to be afraid to build bridges of a similar quality to the Erasmus Bridge.
https://jfdatalinks.blogspot.com/search?q=Cambie+Street+Bridge
Still, No Twinning the Lions Gate Bridge, and for good reason, sort of
The Lions+Gate+Bridge has been the quintessential, multigenerational symbol of backwards Vancouver planning. While it has a couple of nice bike lanes & sidewalks, the one deck bridge is too narrow for an efficient express bus & train crossing. This is a crossing area that should be on a grand scale like The Sydney_Harbour_Bridge and Harbour_Tunnel. However, the Vancouver version would just focus on the tunnel portion.
https://viewpointvancouver.ca/2017/09/28/twinning-the-lions-gate-bridge/
https://viewpointvancouver.ca/2013/10/04/1939-traffic-on-and-above-the-lions-gate-bridge/
By now, there should have been a 6 lane highway tunnel, plus 2 dedicated express bus lanes and at least a double track train tunnel. Then the LG Bridge could remain as a very nice bike & foot crossing.
Unlike Vancouver, Sydney, SF, Seattle and Montreal don't use water as an excuse to hold back their cities scale of transportation infrastructure.
Sunday, January 12, 2025
Frigid nights in the BC Lower Mainland, but still not usually as cold as the rest of Canada
A few freezing nights during each winter month is still pretty mild when compared to the rest of Canada. SW BC is usually the only part of Canada that can avoid weeks of horrible 24hr freezing days that most of the country has to endure. Thus, over the years, more & more people want to move to this part of Canada.
However, it seems that some people over the course of several decades really wanted to establish antigrowth symbolism in backwards BC. Indeed, there seems to have been a multigenerational agenda to keep people out of BC, or at least slow down the influx of people. Canada it self is no where from containing even just 1% of the world's population.
The Lions+Gate+Bridge is so narrow that there should be bus & train tunnels to relieve it.
With so many narrow bridges in BC, its as if some multigenerational power-structure didn't want to allow space for a proper regional network of express bus lanes on wider bridges. A fine example is the new Pattullo+Bridge between NW & Surrey. A bridge so narrow that there isn't enough room for 2 express bus lanes & 2 emergency lanes, let alone 2 truck lanes.
Instead of Vancouver building an abundance of bike-bridges, lanes were removed from the existing bridges. It was almost like NW wanted to have its own symbolic version. But instead of taking 2 lanes away like on the Burrard Bridge or the Granville Bridge, the lanes on the new Pattullo+Bridge just weren't built in the first place. Thus, cars, trucks & buses will still be funneled into only 2 lanes each way.
The very narrow NW-Surrey Skybridge wasn't designed to have 2 bus lanes & 2 bike lanes & sidewalks. The same mistakes or omissions were made with the North_Arm_Bridge, but at least there is one shared bike and foot path on the narrow North-Arm-Bridge. Perhaps some day another path could be added on the east side of the bridge.
Worst of all, most of the Skytrain lines were built with only half-length stations of 80m. The Canadian embarsement Line was designed to only have 50m stations when the Montreal Metro has 152.5m long stations. Despite a provision for the new Pattullo+Bridge to eventually provide 3 lanes each way, it wasn't designed for a future lower deck. That means no provision for another Skytrain crossing or even a future LRT component.
This is all part of a congestive planning mentality.
Even some temporary stairs up to this Burnaby walkway would be an improvement
Some highschool kids from a woodwork class could have built some stairs to reach up to the walkway years ago. Especially, some BCIT steel fabrication & welding students. It's not that the principles of physics are different in this part of Canada, it's just difficult to get some basic things done in backwards BC at times.
The Aurora Bridge in Seattle SR99
https://www.got99problems.org/blog/aurora-bridge
Most of SR99 through Seattle isn't a freeway, but by Vancouver, BC standards, it might as well be.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aurora_Bridge
https://cdn.geekwire.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/seattletraffic-768x572.jpg
https://www.weberthompson.com/project/aurora-bridge-swales-project/
https://www.built.fnf.com/built-podcast/seattle-aurora-bridge
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Washington_State_Route_99
Saturday, January 11, 2025
Kingsgate Mall in Vancouver
https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/british-columbia/vancouver-school-board-kingsgate-mall-1.7429088#
Not 60, no 40, not even a 20 story stump has been built there.
https://vancouversun.com/news/local-news/developer-beedie-wins-lease-dispute-kingsgate-mall
A mixed use commercial tower with reasonable rental units could be built there.
If the upper half was condos and the lower half rental units, plus a few lower commercial levels, the place would be a success, even for the owners. Unfortunatly, things move very slowly in Vancouver & BC in general.
Vancouver’s False Creek ferry service
https://dailyhive.com/vancouver/false-creek-ferries-aquabus-vancouver
The concept of having False_Creek_Ferries was a good idea right from the start.
https://granvilleisland.com/directory/false-creek-ferries
https://granvilleislandferries.bc.ca/
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/False_Creek_Ferries#History
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Aquabus
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/English_Bay_Launch
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Granville_Island#Transportation
Greater Vancouver needs a lot of redundancy or overlapping transportation options.
The SeaBus should be at least every 10 minutes. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SeaBus#Terminals
There should also be a ferry from Deep+Cove to Downtown_Vancouver and even from the Park+Royal area to downtown. The bridges easily get so jammed up & just 1 SeaBus route isn't enough.
Friday, January 10, 2025
Calgary’s drives, roads, streets and trails
The C-Train is essentially a modern LRT, tram-train or an interurban connection to various parts of the city.
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/f/f1/Portage_and_Main_as_seen_from_Portage_Ave_Eastbound.JPG Wow, 5 lanes in 1 direction is very tough to find in Vancouver. Being from Vancouver, its difficult to comprehend how so many cities around the world have such wide streets & boulavards.
https://www.reddit.com/r/Calgary/comments/bkevpf/memorial_drive_year_1900 Wow, one waggon road each way back then. If it were possible in the 2020s, Vancouver would like to go back to one waggon road each way.
https://cc-production-uploads-bucket.s3.amazonaws.com/uploads/2025/01/Calgary-courtesy-of-City-of-CalgaryMainWEB.png This is what Cambie Street in Vancouver could have become. Especially, since the Canada embarrassment Line was only designed to have 2.5 car trains. At least there should be an express bus line along Cambie. Eventually, there still might have to be an LRT line just south of the Cambie+Street+Bridge to Richmond. It would have been better to just build the Canada embarrassment Line to eventually handle a 5, 7 & 9 car train, not a 2.5 car joke of a train.
Sarcastically...
At least no one from Vancouver has been able to convince Winnipeg to reduce Portage_and_Main to 4 lanes or even just 2 waggon roads in width.
https://winnipeg.citynews.ca/2023/04/25/public-insight-sought-on-future-of-winnipegs-portage-and-main This would have been such a great concept.
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/9/99/Paris_-_Orthophotographie_-_2018_-_Place_Charles-de-Gaulle_02.jpg/480px-Paris_-_Orthophotographie_-_2018_-_Place_Charles-de-Gaulle_02.jpg 
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/6/6d/Avenue_des_Champs-%C3%89lys%C3%A9es_July_24%2C_2009_N1.jpg Several wide streets around the world were done in the horse & waggon era. Thus, wide streets weren't for cars & trucks, they were part of a symbolic bustling city.
https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/manitoba/portage-and-main-winnipeggers-react-1.7132404 , https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/manitoba/portage-and-main-opening-to-pedestrians-approved-1.7151756
Woodward_Ave._Detroit was intended to be wide since the 1800's. It went from being a waggon road to becoming M-1_(Michigan_highway).
Market_Street_in_San_Francisco was easily 8 lanes wide, back in the day. Market_Street has wide sidewalks. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Market_Street_(San_Francisco)#Traffic_changes Of course wide streets allow for the potential to be a multi-modal transportation corridor.
Canal_Street,_New_Orleans is easily like 10 lanes wide. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Canal_Street,_New_Orleans#Entertainment
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arc_de_Triomphe
So far, Vancouver hasn't sent a delegation to Paris advising that The Avenue des Champs-Élysées should be turned into a width of only 2 or 4 waggon roads.
A 72-storey tower proposed for Burnaby’s Metrotown
Hardly would be the tallest in Melbourne, Toronto or Seattle, but for backwater BC. This is big time stuff for BC.
Site preparation begins for the tallest office tower in Surrey and BC
https://skyscraperpage.com/cities/?buildingID=132164 225m / 738 ft. https://skyscraperpage.com/diagrams/?cityID=2&status=15
https://storeys.com/surrey-centre-block-office-tower/
https://hariripontarini.com/projects/surrey-city-centre-block/
https://www.urbanstrategies.com/project/surrey-centre-block-master-plan/
Getting Around Colorado
https://www.colorado.com/articles/getting-colorado-getting-around
3 Major Pieces of Infrastructure that will Transform Denver & Colorado https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DlyO-RdWChQ
Thursday, January 9, 2025
Fewer paramedics are on shift as BC Ambulance is millions of $ over budget
https://bc.ctvnews.ca/fewer-paramedics-on-shift-as-bc-ambulance-millions-over-budget-1.7169504
Somehow Montreal and especially Toronto have been able to grow into proper big cities. That means the appropriate amount of infrastructure including, emergency services & hospitals, etc...
It's not just this situation, BC hasn't been properly keeping up with a necessary amount of infrastructure over the past several decades.
BC usually seems to have a tougher time getting things done or coordinated well.
Wednesday, January 8, 2025
Two new Marriott hotels with 457 rooms to open next to Capstan SkyTrain station
https://dailyhive.com/vancouver/marriott-hotels-pinnacle-capstan-station-richmond
Unlike Honolulu, Greater Vancouver has been slow to get many more hotels built. Unfortunatly, Vancouver is only warm for half of the year, bust still usually not as cold as the rest of Canada during the other half of the year.
A 22-storey rental housing tower proposed next to Whole Foods Kitsilano
https://dailyhive.com/vancouver/2268-2294-west-3rd-avenue-1902-1912-vine-street-vancouver-tower
22 not 44 or 66 floors. They are allowed to build so much taller in Melbourne, Sydney & Brisbane, because they don't have such restrictive Vancouver zoning restrictions to deal with. Melbourne, Sydney, Brisbane & Perth are not only warmer than Vancouver, but just as scenic in their own ways.
Unlike Singapore, Honolulu still prevents 50-60 story buildings. Today there are still no buildings with a 50th floor on Oahu.
https://www.de-simone.com/projects/project/ko_olani-tower 47 stories.
Car fire on Arthur Laing Bridge
https://www.richmond-news.com/local-news/car-on-fire-on-arthur-laing-bridge-early-wednesday-10046790
Nothing like a narrow bridge with narrow emegency lanes. https://x.com/LucasGates92/status/1877021160992321586
So many Greater Vancouver bridges need to be twinned or duplicated in order to provide bus & emergency lanes or even truck lanes. This cramming everything into only 2 lanes each way is nuts!
https://www.theage.com.au/national/no-freeways-puts-vancouver-on-top-20060911-ge33wv.html
While not running a freeway through a dense urban area such as Vancouver has its benefits, the bridge crossings still need to be widened. Otherwise, why even bother to pretend to have a proper express or rapid bus network?
https://jfdatalinks.blogspot.com/search?q=Arthur+Laing+Bridge
Tuesday, January 7, 2025
Should all future SkyTrain stations be built right from the start of each line?
https://dailyhive.com/vancouver/skytrain-future-station-locations
Ideally, every intended station on a rail rapid transit line should be built at the same time. However, by allowing some spots for future stations, is also a good idea. Such future stations could already be roughed-out, so when getting completed there is much less disruption.
Whether it's the first 2 Skytrain lines with only 80m stations, or the absurd Canada Line with only a provision for 50m stations, there needs to be better long-range planning to allow for future capacity needs.
By now, there should have been a train connecting the Tsawwassen_ferry_terminal and the Horseshoe_Bay_ferry_terminal to YVR, but that would go against the congestive planning mentality.
All the Skytrain stations should have been designed to eventually be 160m or about 525 feet long. Just because the road system is only half-size, the trains & stations should be full size. However, short trains and narrow bridges are all part of the congestive planning agenda.
The (stumpy) Post in Vancouver
https://dailyhive.com/vancouver/sony-pictures-imageworks-global-headquarters-vancouver-the-post
https://storeys.com/quadreal-graeme-scott-the-post-vancouver-heritage-revitalization-amazon/
What could have been a nice, impressive double 55 story office complex is just another Vancouver stumpy building+complex. In that part of the very restrictive city, the building complex wasn't even allowed to have a 25th floor.
It's all part of the Vancouver stump agenda.
Had Bankers_Hall 1 & 2 in Calgary only been 26 stories, they would just be another stump complex. However, at 52 stories, they remain impressive.
Although Bankers_Hall isn't quite as tall as City_National_Plaza in L.A., both are 52 story complexes. 
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/2/27/PaulHastingsCityNationalTwinTowers.jpg
https://thelocationportal.com/city-national-plaza Fortunately, these towers in L.A. and Calgary weren't Vancouverized stumps.
https://www.skyscrapercenter.com/building/city-national-tower/1395
https://buildingsdb.com/CA/los-angeles/city-national-plaza/
The stump mentality was firmly in place for LA until the late 1960s, when a building was finally allowed to be taller than the 454' LA+City+Hall.
https://jfdatalinks.blogspot.com/search?q=The+Post+in+Vancouver
Monday, January 6, 2025
Greater Vancouver behind the scenes
Vancouver has always been a small city with a backwater mentality, when compared to many other cities. Vancouver is smaller in area & population than 7 other cities in Canada.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_the_largest_municipalities_in_Canada_by_population
However, the Greater Vancouver Region is still the 3 largest metropolitan_area_in_Canada. Yet, it remains a mystery as to where all the big city scale infrastructure went, because what's mostly built in Greater Vancouver is half-sized or half-assed stuff. Indeed, a watered-down approach to things has been the name of the game for generations. Thus, after several decades of not properly building for the future, SW BC is still very congested and backwards.
There is nothing wrong with being small or thinking small. However, Vancouver and Victoria have perpetuated a small-scale mentality for several decades. Of course Vancouver would opt to have shorter underground train stations than Montreal, Toronto, Edmonton & Seattle. A short BC train just can't transport as many people as an 8-10 car train can. Just because the Skytrain is an automated system, the 50m to 80m trains just can't match a 152.5m Montreal Metro trains capacity.
The bridges are narrow, but not just to prevent induced demand. It's almost impossible for backwards Greater Vancouver to have an efficient rapid-bus or proper truck-lanes, when many of the bridges are only 2 lanes each way. Whether its a multigenerational, backwards power-structure, or its just part of the backwater BC mentality, there should be a point of realization.
Why pretend to have an efficient rapid-bus network, when there is a refusal to build a series of proper regional bus & truck bridges? In order for busses to be fast & efficient, there has to be dedicated bus-lanes on new bridges. An efficient regional port using a lot of trucks to the airport & seaports, also requires dedicated truck-lanes in order to efficiently move things around.
https://dailyhive.com/vancouver/global-bc-anchor-behind-the-scenes
Sunday, January 5, 2025
The New Gerald Desmond Bridge
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gerald_Desmond_Bridge
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gerald_Desmond_Bridge#Cable-stayed_replacement
https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/ipd/project_profiles/ca_port_long_beach_gerald_desmond_bridge_project.aspx
The Gerald Desmond Bridge Replacement https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kLMUUVa5eMg
Saturday, January 4, 2025
The O-Train Line 2 and 4 launch
"The lines will begin a five-day service on Jan. 6 (Monday through Friday) and will continue for a minimum of two weeks. Buses through routes B2 (formerly called Line 2 buses), 99 and 97 will run parallel seven days a week in case of any issues." https://ottawa.citynews.ca/2025/01/03/heres-what-to-know-before-o-train-line-2-and-4-launch
This makes a lot of sense & not just because Ottawa is far away from Vancouver & the backwards BC mentality. Trains & people can break down causing a disruption on the tracks. Plus, there is no urban rail or commuter rail line in Canada that's running 24hrs a day. This means that its a good idea to have an express bus route that closely follows each train line 24hrs a day.
Greater Vancouver seems to always be a sleep at the wheel, or just inept with proper urban planning. Once the public was informed that the Skytrain won't be a 24hr system. Therefore, it would be a good idea to have express busses running parallel to each line 24hrs a day.
Unfortunatly, the backward BC planning mentality never allowed for the SkyBridge_linking_NW_and_Surrey_with_SkyTrain to have enough space for 2 bus-lanes, 2 bike-lanes & 2 footpaths. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Skybridge_(TransLink) The bridge has none of that, as if to conform to a BC bottleneck agenda.
The 4 lane Pattullo_Bridge and the 4 lane Queensborough_Bridge were never designed with wide sidewalks & 2 wide emergency lanes. For if they were, then a few decades ago both bridges could have provided 3 lanes each way & have adequate space for bike lanes. A 3rd lane each way would have been great for buses, but that might improve the congestion.
While the new Pattullo_Bridge will actually have wide sidewalks on each side, no serious consideration was given to having 2 bus-lanes, despite the Skytrain not being a 24hr system. So buses, trucks, ambulances & cars will all have to be funneled into only 2 lanes each way. Having 2 bus lanes & 2 wide emergency lanes would actually go against the BC bottleneck mentality.
Even considering budget limitations, the new Pattullo-Bridge should have been designed with a provision for a future lower deck & open with 3 lanes each way & have 2 wide emergency lanes. Apparently, having the Pattullo-Bridge-Replacement with only 2 lanes each way & no emergency lanes somehow will make it easier for emergency vehicles to cross. Of course its the opposite effect, but this is backwards BC.
Surrey, Delta & all of Langley, already have as many people, if not even more people than Ottawa, but the infrastructure is so lacking in BC. Thus, a new 4 lane bridge will be an instant chokepoint between NW & Surrey, Delta & Langley. A 10 lane bridge & a 10 car Skytrain is what a proper urban area of over 3 million people would plan for.
While Vancouver has less people than Ottawa, the BC Lower_Mainland has more people than Calgary, Edmonton & Winnipeg, combined. Thus, its very strange that Vancouver & BC insist on a congestive planning approach.
The 4 lane Queensborough_Bridge in NW has enough space to accommodate a parallel 4 lane bridge. While some backwater BC types might freakout with an 8 lane crossing there, they don't realise that a 4 lane bridge is very limited. Thus, by having two 4 lane bridges, there could be a bus & a truck lane each way as well as 2 general lanes each way. Not having dedicated bus & truck lanes for what is supposed to be a major port is absurd, but its OK for backward BC.
In backwards BC its desired to not have a rail transit component on any of the current road bridges. Indeed, most of the bridges are so narrow that there isn't enough room for either bus lanes or HOV lanes.
Calls for Metrotown Station overpass continue after man left seriously injured by bus
https://dailyhive.com/vancouver/metrotown-overpass-man-struck-bus
The irony is that it has been standing unused for several years. Yet, all it needed was a new connecting stairway.
Friday, January 3, 2025
Telus Towers in Canada
https://dailyhive.com/vancouver/ceo-vancouver-telus-highest-paid-canada
https://www.vanmag.com/city/business/telus-garden-is-green This is one of the ariticles that still say that the complex in Vancouver is over 50 floors. The tower wasn't allowed to rise above the 40s and the office stump doesn't even 25 floors.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Telus_Garden The residential tower isn't 55 or even 50 stories. It was tough enough just to get the city to even allow it to have 46 floors.
https://www.rew.ca/buildings/8822/telus-garden-vancouver-bc It should have been 65-70 stories, but 46 floors is all you get there.
https://www.skyscrapercenter.com/building/telus-garden-residential-tower/14081 46F 135.6 m / 445 ft
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/1/12/Telus_Garden_201807.jpg Its no taller in overal height than the Telus_Tower_in_Montreal.
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/f/f5/Telus_Garden_view_201807.jpg The stump part of the site isn't even 25 floors, when it should have been at least 50-55.
https://telusgarden.com/the-building Their website states that the office part of the development is only 24 stories. https://www.skyscrapercenter.com/complex/598
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Telus_Harbour The Toronto version ended up being like another half-size building from Vancouver.
https://urbantoronto.ca/database/projects/telus-house-25-york-street.2272 This would have been a nice tower if it was 60 floors.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ATB_Place Edmonton
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Telus_Sky , a 60-storey, 222.3 m (729 ft) tower in Calgary.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Telus_Sky#/media/File:Telus_Sky_September_2017.jpg
2024 was Vancouver’s wettest year so far this century
https://vancouversun.com/news/2024-was-vancouvers-wettest-year-so-far-this-century
Too much rain when so many other cities on the planet hardly have any.
First new generation SkyTrain cars to enter service early 2025
https://dailyhive.com/vancouver/new-skytrain-mark-v-cars-entering-service-2025
While a 5 car Mark-V-Skytrain is an improvement, the first 2 lines should have had stations that could eventually accommodate 10 car trains.
https://www.ticorp.ca/projects/surrey-langley-skytrain-project
https://vancouver.citynews.ca/2024/08/15/surrey-langley-skytrain-cost-increase/
https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/british-columbia/surrey-langley-skytrain-costs-1.7295904
https://globalnews.ca/news/10702469/surrey-langley-skytrain-delay-cost-reaction So many cities are able to have LRT as well as subway & elevated trains. Greater Vancouver should have never gotten rid of its streetcars & tram-trains.
The 3rd line should have been designed to eventually accommodate 8-10 car trains. Its not even designed to have 5 car trains, it was only designed to ultimately have 2.5 car trains.
https://jfdatalinks.blogspot.com/search?q=Selective+Door+Operation
Development differences between Surrey and Langley leave road at literal dead end
https://globalnews.ca/news/10940725/development-differences-surrey-langley-road-dead-end/
Surrey & Langley should have a better regional planning perspective.
What good is a carbon tax when roads are so narrow that its almost impossible to have bus lanes?
Thursday, January 2, 2025
Canada's population and its lacking infrastructure
https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/n1/pub/71-607-x/71-607-x2018005-eng.htm
Despite being the 2nd largest nation in overall area, Canada is far off from housing just 1% of the world's population.
There aren't enough big cities in the vastness of Canada.
It's strange that Halifax hasn't become a big city like Boston or Montreal. Since the 2020s, a lot more people work from home and there isn't always an industrial base in major urban areas. More people are retiring and like people working from home, might like living in a town of 1000-10,000 people just as easily as a city with over a 1,000,000 people. The point being, that the top 30 towns in Canada could be built up to at least a million people each. Winnipeg has yet to have a million people. Then the top 10 cities could be built up to 5-10 population regions. Greater Montreal has yet to reach the 5 million point and the Greater Toronto Area has yet to reach 10 million people like Greater Chicago or, CHICAGOLAND. The San_Francisco_Bay_Area is getting close to having 10 million people.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_the_largest_municipalities_in_Canada_by_population Vancouver is only the 8th most populated city.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_census_metropolitan_areas_and_agglomerations_in_Canada#List However, the Greater Vancouver Region is still the 3rd largest urban area in Canada. Yet, it's so far behind with the necessary infrastructure. Indeed, When Greater Toronto & Greater Montreal each exceeded the 3 million point, they had longer trains & wider roads. It seems that Vancouver & BC in general, have perpetually opted for a congestive planning approach.
Will Canada's Next Prime Minister be Pierre Poilievre? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Dck8eZCpglc
Why is anti-immigration sentiment on the rise in Canada? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=txyjmNXcWiU
https://www.norden.org/en/information/population-nordic-region
https://www.nordicstatistics.org/news/population-growth-in-the-nordics Whether its Canada or the Nordic_Countries, places with cold winters can accommodate a lot of people. However, without setting up the proper amount of infrastructure first, its utterly foolish.
Canada hasn't kept up with building enough school & hospital facilities, as well as the overall necessary infrastructure.
https://www.definitivehc.com/resources/healthcare-insights/top-largest-canadian-hospitals
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hamilton_General_Hospital
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Foothills_Medical_Centre
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vancouver_Hospital_and_Health_Sciences_Centre#Facilities
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/St._Paul's_Hospital_(Vancouver) , https://helpstpauls.com/why-give/new-st-pauls-hospital
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fraser_Health#Regional_hospitals
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Surrey_Memorial_Hospital
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Royal_Columbian_Hospital
Unlike the Montreal Metro which can accommodate 9 car trains, the strained Skytrain is only running 4 new-car trains & the inept Canada Line only runs 2 car trains. The Skytrain stations should have been designed to gradually accomodate 8-10 car trains. The Montreal Metro was built with 500 foot long or 152.5m stations right from the start. Apparently, to save money, the first 2 Skytrain lines only have 80m stations & the line to Richmond only has 50m stations, not 152.5m like Montreal.
The inadequate new Pattullo-Bridge was designed to be so narrow that there won't be any emergency lanes. There won't be any bus lanes, even though the Skytrain doesn't run 24 hours. There won't be any truck lanes, despite the region being a major port. Thus, everything is supposed to be funneled into just 2 lanes each way. https://www.
2 lanes were removed from the Burrard Bridge, 1 removed from the Cambie Bridge & 2 lanes removed from the Granville Bridge. Many other cities can actually build bike bridges so they don't have to take away any traffic lanes from their bridges.
Even the new Highway-99-Tunnel is designed to become just another BC bottleneck. There will only be 3 lanes each way & a bus-lane each way. However, there won't be any truck lanes & no emergency lanes. https://www.
So while the Federal Government charges a carbon tax, Greater Vancouver is left with short trains & mostly narrow bridges. It's utterly foolish to not properly upgrade the infrastructure & build a lot of affordable housing, yet encourage a bunch of people to move into a country that hasn't kept up with building more housing stock. I thought that some of the carbon tax would help to properly upgrade the BC infrastructure, because backward BC just can't seem to even catch up to what Calgary & Seattle have. The trains in Montreal, Toronto, Edmonton, Calgary & Seattle are all longer than the short Skytrains. Yet, there is more demand in Vancouver to have longer trains, due to the narrow roads & bridges. Frequent short trains arent enough, there has to be proper big city long trains.
The growth for some of Australia’s cities
https://soe.dcceew.gov.au/urban/pressures/population
https://www.app.com.au/insights/bridging-gap-australias-next-infrastructure-boom
https://www.infrastructureaustralia.gov.au/sites/default/files/2019-06/future-cities-paper-web.pdf
If you are from Perth you might expect that the transportation infrastructure might be of a similar caliber in the BC part of Canada.
Fortunately, the Vancouver mentality didn't make it over to Perth, causing a lane to be removed from the 6 lane Windan_Bridge. Unfortunatly, that was the case with the Cambie_Bridge in Vancouver. Had the bridge been designed to have wide sidewalks on both sides, or a lower level bike path, a traffic lane wouldn't have been removed.
https://www.google.com/maps/place/Windan+Bridge
https://www.google.com/maps/place/Mooro-Beeloo+Bridge Lower shared-use path.
https://www.mainroads.wa.gov.au/projects-initiatives/projects-initiatives-news/tonk-221223-tonkin-gap-bridging-the-gap While the City of Vancouver & the region became obsesd with preventing bridge duplication or twinning, a key aspect was ignored. Since so many bridges in backwards BC are already narrow, they are unable to properly accommodate bus & bike lanes, or even truck lanes. A port region like Greater Vancouver really needs truck lanes, as well as bus & bike bridges. Fortunately, the narrowmindedness of BC hasn't been adopted in WA. Otherwise, this would be a 4 lane chokepoint.
https://www.mainroads.wa.gov.au/travel-information/paths-and-cycling
Perth,WA like Seattle, WA aren't so quick to take away lanes, because foot & bike paths are better integrated into the city. That's also the case with Portland, Calgary, Edmonton, Winnipeg & Montreal...
Perth has an excellent bike path system. https://uncoolcyclingclub.com/perth-swan-river-cycling-loop The Greater Vancouver region has refused to build a proper network of buss & bike bridges, even though that would help to relieve congestion.
Perth+and+Seattle have been able to do so much more than backwards Vancouver, because they aren't hindered by anything like the BC Mind Virus.
Wednesday, January 1, 2025
The Seattle Space Needle and the Calgary Tower
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Space_Needle 1962
| Antenna spire | 605.00 ft (184.404 m) |
|---|---|
| Top floor | 518 ft (158 m) |
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Space_Needle#Architecture
https://www.spaceneedle.com , https://www.spaceneedle.com/webcam
https://www.seattlepi.com/seattlenews/slideshow/Towers-that-resemble-the-Space-Needle-115913.php
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Calgary_Tower 1968
| Antenna spire | 190.8 m (626 ft) |
|---|---|
| Roof | 171 m (561 ft) |
| Top floor | 157.6 m (517 ft) |
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Calgary_Tower#Later_history
https://everydaytourist.ca/globe-trekking-international-travel/2015/9/4/seattle-vs-calgary
The Seattle Space Needle and the Calgary Tower are of a similar size and shape, yet each tower is unique for its city.
Both 600+ft. towers were possible in the 1960s, because they didn't have anything like the extremely restrictive Vancouver height limits. In the 1960's, no building was even allowed to reach 400 ft.
Seattle https://skyscraperpage.com/diagrams/?searchID=107972617&offset=50 , https://skyscraperpage.com/diagrams/?cityID=27&status=15 , https://skyscraperpage.com/diagrams/?cityID=27
Calgary https://skyscraperpage.com/diagrams/?searchID=107972625&offset=25 , https://skyscraperpage.com/diagrams/?cityID=3&status=15 , https://skyscraperpage.com/diagrams/?cityID=3
Vancouver https://skyscraperpage.com/diagrams/?searchID=107972642&offset=50 , https://skyscraperpage.com/diagrams/?cityID=1
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)